{"graphSha256":"f29d7b1eedeb88387238d2abda347f810d2179c5fdbead47c3ef48507ab20ca5","node":{"id":"U1322","type":"ficha","title":"Case Study: Weatherford Multi-Level Information Management for Oilfield Supplier Management","url":"https://dakleyer.github.io/perspective-beyond/sources/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplie-u1322/","original":"https://jubap.us/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplier-management/","aliases":[],"clusters":["us"],"tags":["casos","documentacion","empresa","evidencia"],"summary":"","commit":null,"sourcePath":null,"commitUrl":null,"documentId":"doc-1d239c367168fe979d","tagWeights":{"casos":0.125,"documentacion":0.175,"empresa":0.475,"evidencia":0.225},"reading":"Weatherford and its supplier ecosystem operated in a high-pressure environment where multiple companies, subcontractors, operational teams and compliance frameworks had to coordinate under very tight timelines. The visible face of the problem was QHSE audit readiness and supplier qualification; the structural problem was information management across companies, frontiers and compliance frameworks.\n\nCritical information was fragmented across companies, individuals, folders, audit formats, procedures, evidence files, field certificates, legal matrices, corrective actions and unformalized local knowledge. Each audit essentially demanded the same elements in different languages and formats (Annex S, QHSE, ISO 9001, HSE, environmental controls, legal requirements, training evidence, operating procedures, equipment certifications and subcontractor controls), turning every visit into a “new project” from an evidence preparation standpoint.\n\nThe starting point was low: supplier preparation documents showed an initial compliance of 31% on Annex S with 34 findings, and 8% on the supplier QHSSE audit with 26 findings — a workload equivalent to a full year of safety, environmental and quality activity compressed into a few weeks. This was not a “sort the documents” problem; it was a problem of recovering operational control, reconstructing evidence, translating field reality into audit language and creating a reusable information system across audits and companies.","readingSource":{"url":"https://jubap.us/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplier-management/","section":"Opening paragraphs","observed":"2026-11-04","sourceSha256":"05fa2f7e51cebc25008aeecbd588ad946a04241e05ac93b0ff1338d850d6c213"},"readingSummary":"Weatherford and its supplier ecosystem operated in a high-pressure environment where multiple companies, subcontractors, operational teams and compliance frameworks had to coordinate under very tight timelines.","contextTokens":380},"relations":[["apoyo:U1322:C11","U1322","C11","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:C12","U1322","C12","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:C15","U1322","C15","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:C27","U1322","C27","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:C53","U1322","C53","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:C75","U1322","C75","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["apoyo:U1322:G52","U1322","G52","documenta el concepto","",null,"apoyo",""],["documento:D009","N1835","U1322","candidate transfer","Event time and knowledge time should remain distinct when reconstructing an audit decision.",null,"documento","El paper reconstruye mecanismos temporales de Phylons. Un registro bitemporal en compliance necesita definir autoridad, corrección y retención propias."],["documento:D024","U1322","T2807","analogy only","The supplier case shows why evidence handoff needs the decision context that makes a document meaningful.",null,"documento","Un PDF con metadatos no satisface automáticamente EHD. La comparación no identifica compliance de proveedor con confianza de agentes."],["documento:A038","U1322","T1400","candidate transfer","Reusable audit evidence provides a concrete setting for distinguishing avoidable reconstruction from necessary assurance, while measuring the net work of maintaining the shared evidence model.",null,"documento","No se presupone que la reutilización elimine controles ni que los porcentajes iniciales de cumplimiento midan deuda humana."],["documento:A039","U1322","T2795","candidate transfer","Evidence reuse across audits should carry purpose, scope, version and access conditions, so a reusable record does not become an unrestricted or context-free assertion.",null,"documento","La equivalencia entre requisitos se debe justificar; un mapeo documental no sustituye la aceptación por el auditor competente."],["documento:G036","GH036","U1322","candidate transfer","Selective, source-qualified handoffs could let one field fact support several receivers without exposing unnecessary information or substituting one receiver’s determination for another’s.",null,"documento","Propuesta posterior al caso; no se atribuye al sistema histórico la implementación del protocolo de señalización."],["documento:R048","E1567","U1322","editorial comparison","For a complementary reading, see [Evidence lineage across organizational boundaries](https://jubap.us/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplier-management/).",null,"documento",""],["documento:R058","U1317","U1322","editorial comparison","For a complementary reading, see [Supplier evidence and audit-reactive mapping](https://jubap.us/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplier-management/).",null,"documento",""],["documento:R059","U1322","N1289","editorial comparison","For a complementary reading, see [The operational-tracking architecture](https://jubap.net/information-management-as-operational-tracking/).",null,"documento",""],["documento:R060","U1322","T2795","editorial comparison","For a complementary reading, see [A formal test contract for evidence sufficiency](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-4-canonical-requirements-and-test-contract/).",null,"documento",""],["documento:R136","N1289","U1322","editorial comparison","For a complementary reading, see [Weatherford: operational tracking in a supplier ecosystem](https://jubap.us/case-study-weatherford-multi-level-information-management-for-oilfield-supplier-management/).",null,"documento",""],["navigation:position-nav-U2-U1322","U2","U1322","lectura enlazada desde el documento","Desde «JubAp.US», el enlace «Weatherford Multi-level supplier information, audit readiness and evidence architecture. Read the case study  ↗» abre «Case Study: Weatherford Multi-Level Information Management for Oilfield Supplier Management».","https://jubap.us/","navegacion",""]]}