Perspective Beyond · Mind Atlas
Annex 6 — Ablation, Sufficiency and Extensibility
This page is a technical verification annex to the public-facing foundation article . It is not the canonical source or a standalone article. For the authoritative technical material, use the canonical Ecosystem Positioning README and the versioned sources it indexes. This annex makes the ablation, independence, sufficiency and extensibility analysis inspectable and traceable. Publication on Tegrity.AI does not imply peer review, independent validation, production readiness, adoption as a standard or endorsement by the ITU, FG-TIDA or any cited organisation.
Complete text of this card Card and relationship data
Reading perspectives
Relationships of this piece
13 connections.
→ Contrafactual de carga humana
documenta el concepto
→ Activación de misión
documenta el concepto
→ Ablación de mecanismos
documenta el concepto
→ Comparación justa
documenta el concepto
→ Estado de una afirmación
documenta el concepto
→ Fuga de etiquetas de una fixture
documenta el concepto
→ JubAp.Net Tiger Team Model
hypothesis
A tabletop ablation could test which coordination conditions the Tiger Team model actually depends on.
→ Measuring Human Intelligence Debt
candidate transfer
Task simulations could vary integration, data quality and expert support separately to examine which assumptions drive a human-work counterfactual.
← Barcelona, Cuba, California, Veracruz: Urban Mobility, Swarm Intelligence and Constraint-Driven Architecture
candidate transfer
The complementary field layers suggest an ablation plan: remove or replace one mechanism at a time and examine which operating obligations cease to hold.
← 00K-A16 — Formal Relative Independence Proof of P1–P6 — v0.1
documented use
Relative logical independence, a fixture ablation and an implementation effect answer different questions and should retain separate evidence labels.
← L-09 — Remove accidental public-label leakage without rewriting source examples
candidate transfer
Matched public-view counterworlds can test whether a reported acquisition benefit comes from new evidence rather than accidental fixture-label leakage.
← Annex 5 — Six Positive Paths and Quality Plans
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [Ablation, sufficiency and bounded extensibility](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-6-ablation-sufficiency-and-extensibility/).
→ Annex 8 — Meaning, Contribution and Limits
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [What the results establish and what remains open](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-8-meaning-contribution-and-limits/).