# Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison

This page is a technical verification annex to the public-facing foundation article . It is not the canonical source or a standalone article. For the authoritative technical material, use the canonical Ecosystem Positioning README and the versioned sources it indexes. This annex makes plausibility evidence and documentary technology walkthroughs inspectable and traceable. Publication on Tegrity.AI does not imply peer review, independent validation, production readiness, adoption as a standard or endorsement by the ITU, FG-TIDA or any cited organisation.

Card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T2788/
Source publication: https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-2-plausibility-and-technological-comparison/

RELATIONSHIPS
Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison → Procedencia auditable
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-2/#r-f5026e78538ca792
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C12/

Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison → Comparación justa
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-9/#r-5bc8db843c2c56d6
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C47/

Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison → Estado de una afirmación
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-10/#r-96c458db07a2a202
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C50/

JubAp.Net’s GEPLAN Case before SaaS and IoT Revolutions → Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison
candidate transfer. The historical achievement and a present-day technology comparison require different baselines, evidence and claims.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-37/#r-9aa92d15bb95aed6
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/N1265/

Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison → xSeil 2016 to 2018 Provenance Delivery and Code Evidence
analogy only. Documented provenance can establish what a comparison refers to without establishing that a comparative experiment has been executed.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-37/#r-04374b0e1434b18c
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/N1876/

Car Evolution Mobility OS – Competition → Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison
candidate transfer. Positioning can compare problem classes, while any performance claim requires its own matched task, competent baseline and executed evidence.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-37/#r-a01004c5077da8d0
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/E1956/

Regresiones numéricas → Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison
documented use. Adversarial regressions and a retained positive control support a bounded numerical claim, rather than a general certification of architectural effectiveness.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-41/#r-7ca768e9793fa52b
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/GH060/

Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison → Annex 9 — Claims and Evidence Appendix
editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Claims, evidence and the limits of the comparison](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-9-claims-and-evidence-appendix/).
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-45/#r-8d7d3862a2eefa63
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T2814/