# Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios

This page is a technical verification annex to the public-facing foundation article . It is not the canonical source or a standalone article. For the authoritative technical material, use the canonical Ecosystem Positioning README and the versioned sources it indexes. This annex makes the six constructed scenarios, their mechanisms, gates and intended extensibility inspectable and traceable. Publication on Tegrity.AI does not imply peer review, independent validation, production readiness, adoption as a standard or endorsement by the ITU, FG-TIDA or any cited organisation.

Card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T2784/
Source publication: https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-1-six-failure-scenarios/

RELATIONSHIPS
Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios → Gobierno de escenarios
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-3/#r-9293574eb9ebc2bb
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C22/

Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios → Fallo de composición
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-8/#r-c60d9c89454e88fb
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C45/

Car Evolution Mobility OS – Evidence Cases 03-07 → Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios
hypothesis. The mobility exhibits could seed constructed counterexamples that test the interaction of locally valid policies.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-36/#r-bbf08673a18fbe69
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/E1959/

Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios → Car Evolution Mobility OS – Product Annex
editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The mobility architecture used for applied context](https://jubap.eu/mobility/product/).
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-45/#r-2f0093c03aa92937
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/E1954/