Perspective Beyond · Mind Atlas
Bridge: The Attribution Gap and Capability Loss
Where Human Intelligence Debt and the Attribution Gap converge on a shared failure pattern — offered as an observation, not a proof.
This bridges two independently developed lines of work: the Human Intelligence Debt series — an account of why automatable human work persists, rooted in the scarcity of governance decision capacity — and the Attribution Gap theory — an account of why firms destroy the capabilities they most depend on, rooted in the divergence between contribution and credit. The two were not built to meet. This note records where they do, keeps each theory’s formal machinery in its own house, and is deliberately modest about what the meeting proves. The convergence is offered as something worth attention — a coincidence between two roads — not as evidence for either theory. The case for that restraint is the last section, and it is the point of the note.
Complete text of this card Card and relationship data
Reading perspectives
Relationships of this piece
3 connections.
→ Measuring Human Intelligence Debt
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [The separate Human Intelligence Debt measurement proposal](https://tegrity.ai/meassuring-human-intelligence-debt/).
← Annex 01K — Human Capacity / Human Intelligence Debt
referencia de la fuente
La fuente enlaza esta lectura en «Annex B — Cross-series bridge map» con el rótulo «Attribution Gap ↔ HID».
← JubAp.EU
lectura enlazada desde el documento
Desde «JubAp.EU», el enlace «attribution-and-capability bridge» abre «Bridge: The Attribution Gap and Capability Loss».