# Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems

AI integrity is presented as an operational condition: the transformed system must remain trustworthy while work continues. Governance, evidence and intervention therefore remain connected to the mission boundary.

The enterprise-function proposal concerns responsibility that persists after implementation. Specify the operating boundary, the specialist authorities, the exception path and the receiving owner. A delivery team can build the mechanisms, but the handover must identify who can maintain and revise them during normal operation.

In mission-critical transformation, the project ends the moment operational integrity collapses.

This is the central principle behind the JubAp.Net approach to AI Integrity Management Systems.

Integrity is not treated as an external compliance layer, a cybersecurity checklist, an ethics policy, a governance dashboard or a post-deployment audit exercise. It is the condition that allows a transformed operation to remain trustworthy while it continues running.

Card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/N1283/
Source publication: https://jubap.net/tiger-teams-model-and-ai-integrity-management-systems/

RELATIONSHIPS
Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → Admisibilidad contextual
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-3/#r-bf25ee912ae16fbb
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C15/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → Estado de una afirmación
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-10/#r-99890f82efc78576
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C50/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → Frontera de integridad operacional
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-14/#r-8bf67db9ca5a3cba
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C81/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → Función federada de integridad
documenta el concepto. 
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-15/#r-6708337a4b499cd1
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/conceptos/C88/

The Semantic Tug-of-War: The Turf War for AI Oversight and the Case for “AI Integrity Management” → Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems
analogy only. A shared integrity label becomes useful only when the mission states which cross-domain conditions affect trustworthy operation and who owns them.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-38/#r-c7468f1335baa07f
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T888/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → The Case for AI Integrity Management as a Formal Enterprise Function
analogy only. Mission-level operational integrity and an enterprise integrity function operate at different scopes and should connect through explicit responsibilities rather than be collapsed into one role.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-38/#r-c9e53f1ab2d5aa81
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T878/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → Structural Limits of Current AI Integrity Under Regime Change
analogy only. Transformation integrity requires revisiting the assumptions behind the integrity boundary when the intervention changes the operating regime itself.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-38/#r-ac93aa45a8255e2b
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T387/

Structural Awareness → arquitectura agéntica → ACC / A-B-C-D → aprendizaje de ida y vuelta → Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems
analogy only. A Tiger Team can contribute field evidence and implementation discipline without its delivery result becoming proof of the mathematical or architectural layers above it.
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-41/#r-e294d1336029326f
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/GH063/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → The Case for AI Integrity Management as a Formal Enterprise Function
editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [AI Integrity Management as an enterprise function](https://tegrity.ai/the-case-for-ai-integrity-management-as-a-formal-enterprise-function/).
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-44/#r-9786f1ead7cba7be
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T878/

Tiger Teams Model and AI Integrity Management Systems → When the Controls Work but the System Fails
editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The system-level limits of locally correct controls](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-but-the-system-fails/).
Relationship: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/relaciones/pagina-44/#r-ece2e44fa15fa46c
Other card: https://integralmanagement.ch/atlas-reader/fichas/T2776/