Perspective Beyond · Mind Atlas
Diamond Inside
Most rationalization begins the same way: count the number of applications serving a single capability, identify the surplus, and mark it for removal. In a uniform organization that instinct is often sound. In a decentralized, heritage-rich group it is frequently mistaken — and the mistake is invisible at the moment it is made, because a list cannot show the difference between a costly redundancy and a deliberate adaptation.
The number of solutions per capability is not, by itself, evidence of inefficiency. It is evidence that the same need was met more than once. Whether that is waste depends entirely on why.
Complete text of this card Card and relationship data
Reading perspectives
Relationships of this piece
4 connections.
← THE DIAMOND INSIDE FRAMEWORK
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [Rationalization as value discovery](https://jubap.eu/rationalization-as-value-discovery/).
→ THE DIAMOND INSIDE FRAMEWORK
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [The complete Diamond Inside framework](https://jubap.eu/the-diamond-inside-framework/).
→ When Cleaning Up Means Betting Blind
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [When cleanup risks destroying hidden value](https://tegrity.ai/when-cleaning-up-means-betting-blind/).
← JubAp.Net’s GEPLAN Case before SaaS and IoT Revolutions
editorial comparison
For a complementary reading, see [Rationalization as value discovery](https://jubap.eu/rationalization-as-value-discovery/).